Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM • Updated October 2026
Grade A — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM has a clean recent record: no health-based violations in the last five years and no lead, PFAS or historical monitoring result that costs it more than a few points.
Yes — by EPA's records Baker, LA tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on 1 health-based EPA violation in the last five years. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes — by EPA's records Baker, LA tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on 1 health-based EPA violation in the last five years. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2021-01-01 to 2023-12-31) was 1 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM (2024-06-19 to 2024-12-02) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM has 3 violations on file since 2016: 1 health-based in the last five years and 0 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 13,855 people (EPA PWSID LA1033003).
We recommend one. Check which contaminant the violations involved (table above) and choose a filter certified for it.
Compare filter options for your Baker tap water
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM has 1 health-based EPA violation in the last five years.
See the filters matched to Baker's EPA results → — which certification actually removes what was found here, and what it does not touch.
Unsure which contaminants to treat? Compare home kits and certified lab testing before buying.
Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-13
EPA records 1 health-based violation for this system in the last five years, all of which are marked resolved or archived. Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) or a required treatment step was not met.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, AverageTTHM | MCL exceeded | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 | Resolvedreturned 2023-03-31 |
| Consumer Confidence Report Inadequate ReportingConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2017-10-01 | Resolvedreturned 2018-06-08 |
| Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to ReportConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2017-07-01 | Resolvedreturned 2018-06-08 |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM
Well below the 15 ppb action level. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2021-01-01 to 2023-12-31), 90% of the homes CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM sampled had lead at or below 1 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2018-01-01 → 2020-12-31 | 2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2015-01-01 → 2017-12-31 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2012-01-01 → 2014-12-31 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2009-01-01 → 2011-12-31 | 2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2002-01-01 → 2004-12-31 | 6 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1993-01-01 → 1993-06-30 | 5 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1992-07-01 → 1992-12-31 | 6 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2024-06-19 to 2024-12-02 · 232 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
No PFAS detected. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM were at or above the method reporting limit. Reporting limits are about 3–5 ppt, so “not detected” means below that threshold — not proven zero.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 8 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 8 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 0 / 8 | < 3 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
Lithium (also monitored under UCMR5, not a PFAS): detected in 3 of 8 samples, max 9.4 µg/L. There is no federal limit for lithium.
What PFAS are and how to remove them →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) is flagged below; the status column explains why. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 11079 detects | 18.16 µg/L | 109 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | 1 single sample over MCL; average within limit |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 11088 detects | 9.966 µg/L | 47.6 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Lead (tap samples) | 6028 detects | 0.8 µg/L | 18 µg/L | 15 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
| Copper (tap samples) | 6014 detects | 40 µg/L | 1100 µg/L | 1300 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
A point-of-use (under-sink) system typically runs $200-$600 installed; whole-house treatment $1,000-$3,000+ depending on flow and what has to come out. Tell us where you are and a certified water-treatment installer serving Baker will follow up - no obligation.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM · 6,199 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM reports no lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement service lines and has classified 100% of its 6,199 lines as non-lead. Lead can still come from pre-1986 plumbing and fixtures inside a home.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID LA1033003 · See all Louisiana lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Groundwater systems draw from wells; naturally occurring arsenic, nitrate, radium and uranium are the readings to watch, along with PFAS near industrial or military sites.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Baker homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Baker faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Baker households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Baker residents measured at their own tap (ZIPs 70714). All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Baker yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Baker ranks #17 of 22 graded Louisiana cities.
Yes — by EPA's records Baker, LA tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on 1 health-based EPA violation in the last five years. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2021-01-01 to 2023-12-31) was 1 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM (2024-06-19 to 2024-12-02) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM has 3 violations on file since 2016: 1 health-based in the last five years and 0 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 13,855 people (EPA PWSID LA1033003).
We recommend one. Check which contaminant the violations involved (table above) and choose a filter certified for it.
CITY OF BAKER WATER SYSTEM has 1 health-based EPA violation in the last five years.
For Everyday Peace of Mind
Brita Elite Pitcher
Your water already tests well — a simple carbon filter improves taste and catches trace contaminants.
Check Price on AmazonNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Find the right filter for your Baker water quality needs:
Tap water is one piece of the picture — our sister sites cover the rest for Baker, LA.
County radon prediction and EPA zone for homes around Baker.
Arsenic and nitrate risk for homes on a well instead of city water.
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.