Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE • Updated October 2026
Grade D — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE has notable problems in EPA's records — health-based violations, elevated lead or PFAS above the federal limit. A certified filter is a reasonable precaution.
Livermore, CA tap water is legal to drink but grades D on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling and lead at 7.5 ppb (90th percentile) — under the 15 ppb action level but above 5 ppb. A certified filter matched to those findings is a reasonable precaution.
Livermore, CA tap water is legal to drink but grades D on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling and lead at 7.5 ppb (90th percentile) — under the 15 ppb action level but above 5 ppb. A certified filter matched to those findings is a reasonable precaution.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31) was 7.5 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2023-07-10 to 2024-07-16) detected PFBS, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
No. EPA's SDWIS shows no violations of any kind for CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE since 2016.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE reports purchased surface water as its primary source and serves about 60,414 people (EPA PWSID CA0110003).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result. An NSF/ANSI 53 lead-certified filter addresses lead.
Compare filter options for your Livermore tap water
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Livermore's UCMR5 sampling.
See the filters matched to Livermore's EPA results → — which certification actually removes what was found here, and what it does not touch.
Unsure which contaminants to treat? Compare home kits and certified lab testing before buying.
Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-13
EPA records no health-based violations for this system in the last five years.
No violations of any kind on file since 2016.
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE
Below the action level, but detectable. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 90% of the homes CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE sampled had lead at or below 7.5 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31 | 7.5 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | 1.8 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | 2.07 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2014-01-01 → 2016-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2002-01-01 → 2004-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2001-01-01 → 2003-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31 | 8 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1997-01-01 → 1997-12-31 | 5 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2023-07-10 to 2024-07-16 · 696 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
PFOA and PFOS measured at or above EPA's legal limit in at least one sample. Utilities have until 2029 (2031 under EPA's proposed extension) to comply with the 2024 PFAS rule, so a result above the MCL today is not yet a violation — but it is the number that matters for your health.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 3 / 24 | 4.8 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 9 / 24 | 12 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 11 / 24 | 9.8 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 24 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 24 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 8 / 24 | 4.2 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFHxA | 6 / 24 | 3.9 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFPeA | 7 / 24 | 3.6 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
Lithium (also monitored under UCMR5, not a PFAS): detected in 11 of 24 samples, max 25.1 µg/L. There is no federal limit for lithium.
What PFAS are and how to remove them → · Best filters for PFAS →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Nitrate (as N) is flagged below; the status column explains why. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 1 | 0.831 µg/L | 0.831 µg/L | 10 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Nitrate (as N) | 1,0631060 detects | 5.24 mg/L | 16.85 mg/L | 10 mg/LMCL | 11 of 1063 samples over MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 1 | 5.878 µg/L | 5.878 µg/L | 100 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Uranium (combined) | 1 | 0.493 µg/L | 0.493 µg/L | 30 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 438120 detects | 5.855 µg/L | 42.8 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 116104 detects | 9.556 µg/L | 19 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Lead (tap samples) | 1 | 0.296 µg/L | 0.296 µg/L | 15 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
| Copper (tap samples) | 1 | 6.343 µg/L | 6.343 µg/L | 1300 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
A point-of-use (under-sink) system typically runs $200-$600 installed; whole-house treatment $1,000-$3,000+ depending on flow and what has to come out. Tell us where you are and a certified water-treatment installer serving Livermore will follow up - no obligation.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE · 18,889 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE reports no confirmed lead service lines, but 14,400 lines (76%) have not yet been verified, so lead cannot be ruled out for those homes. Utilities must keep investigating unknown lines under EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Improvements.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID CA0110003 · See all California lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Surface-water systems draw from rivers, lakes or reservoirs and must filter and disinfect, which is why disinfection byproducts (TTHM, HAA5) are the readings to watch.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Livermore homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Livermore faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Livermore households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Livermore residents measured at their own tap (ZIPs 94550, 94551). All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Livermore yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Livermore ranks #156 of 163 graded California cities.
Deep-dive guides for the specific contaminants EPA data flagged in Livermore's water, with removal options for each.
Livermore, CA tap water is legal to drink but grades D on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling and lead at 7.5 ppb (90th percentile) — under the 15 ppb action level but above 5 ppb. A certified filter matched to those findings is a reasonable precaution.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31) was 7.5 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2023-07-10 to 2024-07-16) detected PFBS, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
No. EPA's SDWIS shows no violations of any kind for CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE since 2016.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - LIVERMORE reports purchased surface water as its primary source and serves about 60,414 people (EPA PWSID CA0110003).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result. An NSF/ANSI 53 lead-certified filter addresses lead.
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Livermore's UCMR5 sampling.
Most Popular for Lead
ZeroWater 10-Cup Pitcher
NSF 53 certified to reduce lead & chromium — no installation, the easiest way to start protecting your water today.
Check Price on AmazonCompare direct from Waterdrop
Filters rated for lead reduction
Waterdrop's lead collection — every filter here is selected for lead reduction, so you can compare options rated for this exact problem.
Shop Filters Rated for Lead →Whole-Home Filtration System
Whole-house system — treats every tap at the source
For consistently poor water, a whole-home system filters every faucet, shower, and appliance — the permanent, install-once fix that goes beyond a single point-of-use filter.
Explore Whole-Home SystemsNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Based on contaminants detected in your water, these resources may be helpful:
Find the right filter for your Livermore water quality needs:
Tap water is one piece of the picture — our sister sites cover the rest for Livermore, CA.
Predicted indoor radon by ZIP vs. the EPA 4 pCi/L action level.
Arsenic and nitrate risk for homes on a well instead of city water.
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.